Skip to main content
WinCC Explorer & S7-1500 · Practical Blog 5 of 10

Add Alarms, Trends and State Tests to a WinCC Explorer Factory Screen

Complete a WinCC Explorer factory display with Alarm Logging, Tag Logging, clear symbol states and practical tests for faults, valve feedback and invalid data.

What you will build: A training screen with alarm/history views and a completed test record for normal, fault and recovery conditions.

WinCC Classic · Explorer + Graphics Designer · Updated 6 September 2026

Alarm, acknowledgment and trend test sequenceA fault source can remain active after acknowledgment. A separate history plot shows recorded level and flow values over time.TEST EVENTS AND HISTORY SEPARATELYP-101 transfer pump fault · ACTIVE · not acknowledgedAcknowledge → fault source can still remain ACTIVEIllustrative recorded history · separate units/axes in the actual trendLevel %Flow m³/h
Original training illustration. Simplified equipment symbols and example values; use the approved plant legend and project requirements for engineering work.

Use alarms and trends to explain the process

The overview tells the operator what is happening now. Alarms should identify conditions requiring attention, while trends help explain how the process reached its present state. Add both to the Unit 101 exercise after the basic tags and symbols work.

WinCC Explorer provides Alarm Logging for the message system and Tag Logging for archived process values. In Graphics Designer, use the corresponding alarm and trend controls supported by your installed release. The Siemens Getting Started guide introduces these workflows; check the local Information System for your version’s control configuration.

The alarm names and test values below are teaching examples. Actual thresholds, priority, delay and response must come from the plant’s approved requirements.

Define the alarm before configuring its row

Example alarm design worksheet
ConditionExample messageRequired definition
Pump fault signalP-101 transfer pump faultSource bit, priority, acknowledgment and operator response
Low tank levelTK-101 level lowApproved limit, delay, hysteresis and operating relevance
Valve feedback conflictXV-101 open/closed feedback conflictInvalid combination and persistence rule
Invalid process dataUnit 101 process data unavailableQuality/communication detection and recovery behavior
  1. For the first exercise, use one documented training message source for the pump fault.
  2. In Alarm Logging, configure its message text and the appropriate message class/type and acknowledgment behavior.
  3. Connect the trigger according to the configured message method. A discrete message may use a bit in a message tag; record the actual method and bit mapping for your project.
  4. Place the alarm control on a training alarm picture or the designated screen area. Show enough context to identify the equipment and event time.
  5. Trigger, acknowledge and clear the source in separate steps. Observe the message state at each step rather than treating acknowledgment as fault removal.

Do not show “fault cleared” merely because the operator acknowledged a message. Fault-source recovery and message acknowledgment are separate events.

Animate only what has a clear meaning

Connect pump and valve appearances to the feedback model from Lesson 3. If you add a pipe-flow indication, use a defined measured-flow condition with data validity; do not make the pipe appear to flow simply because a start request exists.

Keep the normal display stable. Avoid decorative continuous motion that competes with alarms. Use text and symbols together for FAULT, UNKNOWN and FEEDBACK CONFLICT. Define any blinking behavior in the project’s display convention rather than using it for every changing value.

Complete the final training test record

Acceptance tests — record actual result and evidence for each row
TestInput / actionExpected result
Normal transferValid data, pump feedback on, valve open, nonzero flowConsistent states and readable values
Pump faultSet training fault sourceFAULT appearance and correct equipment message
AcknowledgmentAcknowledge while fault source remains activeMessage acknowledgment changes; fault indication remains
Valve conflictOpenFb = 1 and ClosedFb = 1Conflict indication instead of normal OPEN
Data invalidSet training validity helper to 0UNKNOWN/invalid appearance; no false healthy state
Archive retrievalReturn to the earlier test time windowStored level and flow samples are available
RecoveryRestore valid data and clear the fault sourceStates recover according to the documented rules

The validity-helper test checks the picture response only. In a connected commissioning test, separately verify the real communication-loss and quality-detection path under the project test procedure.

Final deliverable: keep the annotated P&ID, equipment register, tag sheet, symbol-state sheet, picture revision, alarm definitions, archive settings and completed test record together. Another engineer should be able to trace any screen item back to its drawing tag and test evidence.

You have completed the first five blogs in the ten-part series: understand the process, create symbols, connect data, build the operator picture and verify events/history. Further work can extend the same method to additional units without changing the underlying engineering discipline.

Software references

The exercises and illustrations are original learning material. For the editor functions and release-specific settings, consult Siemens documentation:

Menu names, control properties and library contents vary by installed version. Use your local WinCC Information System for the exact object or dialog.

Continue your WinCC practice

Use the WinCC Explorer manual for related configuration work, or discuss a practical training requirement.

WinCC Explorer manualContact a training advisor
☎ Call WhatsApp ✉ Email Enquire Now